What makes a good horror story? What’s the correct formula? Three naive teens, a haunted house and a ouija board? Or is it an American summer camp, where kids go missing and something dark and dangerous moves in the woods?
The key to writing horror does not lie with which monster stalks the screen or paces the page. It is easy to get caught in a kind of “creative claustrophobia” (King, 2008) when writing horror in particular – hence why some authors fall into the trap of lathering their piece in typical tropes and stereotypes, practically yelling out ‘Ok, be scared now!’ However, if written correctly, anything can seem scary, whether that be a beloved childhood toy or your next door neighbours, who always smile and wave when you catch their eye – as a society brought up on fear mongering and suspicions, we have learnt to fear those closest to us over the unfamiliar.
Anne Rice, a well-known author of gothic fiction, describes horror as the “confusion of the senses, confusion of the mind to overwhelming physical responses.” (Badley, 1996) And we can see that this is true – triggering the deep rooted fear of the unknown, the incomprehensible, is a sure way to give your audience the goosebumps and knot their shoulders with worry. Creating a physical threat isn’t always the best way to spook a unsuspecting innocent – playing with their emotions, toying with their mind and blurring reality can be a much more effective scare. And why wouldn’t it be? A ghost can be sent into the light, a demon can be exorcised, and a monster can always be killed. But when the threat lives in your mind, there is no escape.
However, it has to be said that the success of a piece of horror fiction doesn’t lie entirely with the writer – the reader must take some responsibility here. When it comes to horror, people tend to have very particular tastes. I mean, no one wants a horror story that flops – there’s nothing worse than waiting for a scare that just doesn’t come, and those cravings for tension and adrenaline just haven’t been satisfied. For example, stories such as “A Worse Mousetrap” and “Latex” are, to me, unsuccessful works. I’m not afraid, or anxious, I’m not watching my fingers shake as I attempt to turn the page – at best, a mere discomfort at the topics raised. But does this mean Michael A. Arnzen is unsuccessful? Or maybe just not to my taste? Some readers love these slightly more unusual works, reporting the same feelings of fear that are only unlocked in me by the frightening face of a clown. Perhaps that low level of discomfort I felt whilst reading, also known as “the creeps”, shows that Arnzen triumphed after all.
So when you next sit down with a pen and paper and start racking your brain for horror ideas, take a minute to think. What is really gonna push the “national phobic pressure points”? Get people’s skin crawling, and having them check under their beds at night? Depending on what you write, monsters won’t be the only thing they’re looking for under there. Continue reading Horror and the Writer